William C. Rawe, Ph.D.

The Situation

 

A multi-campus senior living organization undertook a full-lifecycle implementation of Yardi ERP and Aline CRM — replacing the systems that managed its finances, operations, and resident relationships across all campuses simultaneously.

 

The technical risk was manageable. The human risk was not. The workforce spanned accounting professionals, campus operators, sales teams, and frontline staff — many with years of habit invested in the old systems, and most with no reason to welcome new ones. Industry experience is blunt on this point: enterprise implementations rarely fail at configuration. They fail at adoption, after go-live, when the project team has moved on, and the workforce quietly reverts to workarounds.

 

The Approach

 

What made this implementation unusual was that the person who designed the change strategy was the same person administering the system: an organizational psychologist. Dr. Rawe directed both the technical implementation and the human side of the change — meaning adoption was engineered into the rollout rather than appended to it.

​

Change readiness before go-live. Resistance was treated as data, not disobedience. Likely friction points were identified by role and campus and addressed in the rollout sequence rather than discovered in the aftermath.

​

Role-based training, not system tours. Each employee group was trained on its own workflows in the new system — the twenty things they would actually do — rather than marched through generic feature demonstrations. Training effectiveness was measured at multiple levels using Kirkpatrick-aligned evaluation, so the organization knew what was learned, not just what was attended.

​

Managers as the front line of change. Supervisors and campus leaders were equipped to model the new systems, answer the first wave of questions, and reinforce adoption daily — because employees take their cues about whether change is real from their direct leaders, not from project announcements.

 

The Results

 

User resistance fell by 40% relative to the organization’s baseline expectations — and adoption held steady after go-live. The enterprise training program ultimately reached more than 700 employees and contributed to a 25% increase in productivity, a 15% reduction in turnover, and a 30% improvement in employee satisfaction. The systems became how the organization works, not a mandate it tolerates.

 

The Takeaway

 

Your implementation partner will configure the software correctly. Whether your people adopt it is a separate discipline — one grounded in psychology, training design, and leadership alignment. Organizations that engineer the human side of implementation get the system they paid for. Organizations that don’t get a very expensive license.

 

Implementing Yardi, Aline, or another enterprise platform?